Advancing Clean Power of the Future
Carnegie Mellon University researchers have calculated that the U.S. can meet — or even beat — the near-term carbon dioxide emission reductions required by the United Nations Paris Agreement, despite the Trump administration's withdrawal of the Clean Power Plan (CPP).
The Carnegie Mellon team used data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration's 2017 Annual Energy Outlook to examine projected power sector carbon dioxide emissions to determine if the CPP emission targets for 2020, 2025 and 2030 can still be met. The findings, published in an Environmental Science & Technology viewpoint, showed that emissions declined from 2.7 billion tons to an estimated 1.9 billion tons, and revealed a strong link to natural gas prices as being a driving market force. The decrease puts U.S. emissions reduction on the CPP's target for 2025.
"The U.S. has already come quite far in reducing carbon dioxide emissions," said Jeffrey J. Anderson, a doctoral candidate in the Department of Engineering and Public Policy. "The biggest driver of lower carbon dioxide emissions has been declining natural gas prices, which has allowed the industry to replace coal-fired power plants economically with cleaner natural gas power plants — and without a costly regulatory mandate."
Additional actions are needed to assure longer-term compliance with Paris Agreement objectives — and to safeguard against the impact of a rise in natural gas prices. For example, regulatory and legislative focus should be on maintaining the trajectory that market forces have created to sustain the current transition period into the intermediate future. To meet longer-term and deeper de-carbonization goals, there will be a need for proactive regulatory activity. In addition, incentivizing low or zero carbon dioxide-emitting sources, improving energy efficiency and encouraging repowering and retrofitting options are other important avenues to de-carbonizing the power sector.
"Our work shows that the U.S. power sector could meet the Paris Agreement goals even without the Clean Power Plan, and that the path to compliance can be a collection of politically feasible, minimally invasive actions — if we plan ahead and start now," said David Rode, a recent Ph.D. graduate from the Department of Social and Decision Sciences.
In addition to Anderson and Rode, Paul Fischbeck, professor of social and decision sciences and engineering and public policy, and Haibo Zhai, associate research professor of engineering and public policy, worked on the study.